ONE STOCK. MULTIPLE WRAPPERS. EVERY FRICTION COUNTS.READ THE THESIS ›
W WRAPPERBASIS
THE PRICE IS VISIBLE.
THE REASON SHOULD BE TOO.
Understand the numbers ↗
TOKENIZED EQUITIES / EXPLAINEDRedemption time + liquidity + rights + transfer frictionILLUSTRATIVE NUMBERS
THE WRAPPERBASIS OPPORTUNITY

Same stock.
Different wrapper.
Explain the gap.

Look inside the premium or discount. Understand what the wrapper changes before deciding what the price means.

PRICE ≠ VALUEA discount can be the cost of waiting, exiting or holding different rights.
ONE FICTIONAL TOKEN / ONE SHARE
REFERENCE STOCK$150.00
↓
WRAPPER QUOTE$146.00
RAW PRICE DIFFERENCE$4.00
−2.67%OF THE REFERENCE

The raw difference is the starting point. The next step is to explain how much of it comes from friction.

01 / NORMALIZE02 / EXPLAIN03 / MEASURE04 / INVESTIGATETHE SPREAD HAS A STORY.
THE $4 QUESTIONA LOWER PRICE NEEDS AN EXPLANATION.FOLLOW EVERY DOLLAR →
EXAMPLE BREAKDOWN / PER TOKEN$4.00

Raw gap.
Look closer.

$2.25 assumed friction.
$1.75 left to investigate.

01 / COMPARE LIKE WITH LIKE

1 token ≠ always 1 share

Check the token ratio before comparing two prices.

02 / TIMESTAMP CHECK

The clock matters

A stale quote can look like a new opportunity.

03 / EXIT REALITY

A quote is not a fill

Depth and slippage change the amount you can realize.

04 / TERMS CHECK

Rights change value

Redemption and lending permissions are separate inputs.

05 / SIGNAL CHECK

−1.17 z-score

The example deviation in assumed volatility units.

06 / RESEARCH RULE

No promised profit

A gap can persist, widen or cost more to exit.

FOUR REASONS A WRAPPER CAN TRADE DIFFERENTLY.

THE ECONOMICS UNDER THE TOKEN
◷01 / TIME

Redemption delay

Waiting to convert a token back into the underlying exposure can tie up capital and introduce uncertainty.

MODEL INPUT: REDEMPTION TIME
≋02 / DEPTH

Exit liquidity

A thin market can make the displayed price difficult to realize when a holder actually needs to sell.

MODEL INPUT: LIQUIDITY
§03 / TERMS

Holder rights

Similar economic exposure can come with different redemption, lending and collateral permissions.

MODEL INPUT: RIGHTS PENALTY
↔04 / MOVEMENT

Transfer friction

Wallet eligibility, chain boundaries and transfer restrictions can reduce how freely a position moves.

MODEL INPUT: TRANSFER COST
EXPLAIN EVERY DOLLAR

From $4.00
of difference
to $1.75
to investigate.

A simple teaching model puts numbers on the assumptions. It makes the remaining gap visible.

Change the price & delay →
Start with the reference$150.00One token represents one share in this example.
Subtract the assumed friction−$2.250.5% for five days + 0.5% liquidity + 0.5% rights.
Friction-adjusted model value$147.75$150 × (1 − 1.5%)
Compare with the fictional quote$146.00$1.75 below the model; z-score ≈ −1.17 at 1% basis volatility.

HOW A PRICE DIFFERENCE BECOMES A RESEARCH QUESTION.

THE PROPOSED APPROACH
01

Make the comparison fair.

Align reference prices, token ratios, currencies and timestamps.

02

Explain the expected basis.

Model redemption, liquidity, rights and transfer frictions together.

03

Measure the deviation.

Compare observed basis with model basis using an explicit volatility assumption.

04

Test the explanation.

Investigate historical convergence, executable depth and actual wrapper terms.

Understand the idea. Change the inputs. See the dollars.

Read the guide & try the simulation →
INSIDE THE FAIR-VALUE MODEL THE MATH BEHIND THE DIFFERENCE
THE MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATION

A fair basis before a trading signal.

bⱼ = Pⱼ / Pref − 1 · zⱼ = (bⱼ − b̂ⱼ) / σb

b̂ⱼ = θ₀ + θ₁Tredeem + θ₂Liquidity⁻¹ + θ₃RightsPenalty + θ₄TransferFriction

Pⱼ / Pref
Wrapper price relative to reference
Tredeem
Days required for redemption
b̂
Model fair premium or discount
σb
Assumed basis volatility
THE ECOSYSTEM ROADMAP

More wrappers.
More reasons to understand the basis.